![](https://neutronbytes.files.wordpress.com/2024/04/data-center_thumb.png)
Knowledge Middle Dynamics, a pc trade commerce publication based mostly in London, UK, revealed a report that Microsoft and OpenAI plan to construct a brand new $100 billion supercomputer middle that can require 5 GW {of electrical} energy, provided by nuclear reactors, when accomplished someday within the 2030s.
The venture is predicted to depend on nuclear reactors to generate the required energy for the location’s large arrays of racks of excessive efficiency computer systems. The commerce press report cites a 2028 launch date to begin work on the power. It is a large venture and comes with a boatload of questions on its feasibility.
In my evaluation of the Microsoft venture, revealed by Knowledge Middle Dynamics on 04/09/24, I ask key questions concerning the challenges and alternatives dealing with the huge effort. Additionally, I level to some believable solutions.
Right here’s a abstract of the questions I deal with in my report.
Q: Who will or can construct 5 GW of nuclear era capability?
As large as they’re, not one of the main IT platforms like Microsoft, Google, or Amazon, are going to get into the enterprise of straight constructing 5 GW of nuclear reactors nor nuclear reactors of any measurement. The first type of entry to nuclear energy for these corporations will likely be by way of energy buy agreements with nuclear utilities. Microsoft has already taken this method with Constellation. Amazon bought a knowledge middle outright on account of its reference to a nuclear utility in Pennsylvania.
Q: The place might the US information middle and reactors be constructed?
The US has quite a lot of websites that had been beforehand thought of for brand spanking new nuclear reactors. Throughout the US there are greater than a dozen deliberate nuclear energy tasks that sought or additionally obtained NRC COL licenses that had been by no means constructed.
Q: Ought to Microsoft construct the complete information middle at one web site?
A query Microsoft would possibly think about is whether or not to assemble its wanted 5 GWE of nuclear producing capability by way of a community of 1 GW energy crops relatively than constructing one single web site with all 5 GW of nuclear energy and information processing capabilities on it? Does the nuclear energy plant must be adjoining to the information middle?
If not, will enough grid connections be out there to guarantee 24 x 7 dependable energy from the reactor to the information middle? Is it possible with networking to deal with the large processing necessities of AI massive language fashions and different functions.
Q: What concerning the want for water for cooling the reactors and the information facilities?
Large information facilities, which have very vital demand hundreds for cooling water, share that profile with nuclear energy crops. The dispersal of the warmth hundreds from each kinds of amenities would require monumental quantities of water which might probably compete with different kinds of makes use of within the area the place the information middle is constructed.
Q: Is the federal authorities doing something about getting extra energy for large information facilities?
In late March in a go to to Michigan, DOE Secretary Jennifer Granholm stated the Biden administration desires to “speed up” its conversations with large know-how firms on the right way to generate extra electrical energy — together with with nuclear energy — to satisfy their large demand for synthetic intelligence computing.
Q: What about grid entry for the reactors to ship the facility?
One of many different points dealing with information middle builders searching for energy is grid entry to energy crops that aren’t adjoining to the information facilities. The Federal Vitality Regulatory Fee (FERC) is meant to be “reforming the method” by which new excessive voltage electrical energy transmissions strains are authorized for building and operation.
An enormous backlog of choices signifies the company has its work minimize out for it. Based on S& P World, on the finish of 2022, greater than 2,000 GW of era and storage — equal to all current US producing capability — had been ready in interconnection queues, and profitable tasks can face wait occasions of as much as 5 years to connect with the grid.
Q: Is Microsoft’s a case of overreach?
In abstract, it’s value asking one ultimate query, and that’s whether or not Microsoft’s plans for a 5 GWe information middle are overreach? Whereas the agency wouldn’t be within the enterprise of constructing nuclear reactors, its plans to supply commitments of energy buy agreements for nuclear energy at this scale would put any single publicly traded electrical utility in a “guess the corporate” posture.
Primarily based on expertise within the US up to now, with the Westinghouse reactors in Georgia, it’s uncertain, a minimum of for now, that any US nuclear utility would step as much as the plate to tackle the venture even with Microsoft’s deep pockets writing the checks. The dual 1,150 MW AP1000s arrived seven years late and $17 billion over funds.
Microsoft has an enormous job forward of it and that’s to persuade energy producers within the US, or globally, that it isn’t biting off greater than it could possibly chew.
# # #