Yu, Z. et al. Rational solvent molecule tuning for high-performance lithium metallic battery electrolytes. Nat. Vitality 7, 94–106 (2022).
Google Scholar
He, X. et al. The passivity of lithium electrodes in liquid electrolytes for secondary batteries. Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 1036–1052 (2021).
Google Scholar
Fan, L. Z., He, H. & Nan, C. W. Tailoring inorganic−polymer composites for the mass manufacturing of solid-state batteries. Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 1003–1019 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lu, Z. et al. Crowning metallic ions by supramolecularization as a normal treatment towards a dendrite-free alkali-metal battery. Adv. Mater. 33, e2101745 (2021).
Google Scholar
Li, S. et al. A strong all-organic protecting layer in the direction of ultrahigh-rate and large-capacity Li metallic anodes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 613–621 (2022).
Google Scholar
Koerver, R. et al. Capability fade in solid-state batteries: interphase formation and chemomechanical processes in nickel–wealthy layered oxide cathodes and lithium thiophosphate strong electrolytes. Chem. Mater. 29, 5574–5582 (2017).
Google Scholar
Wang, Y. et al. 5V–class sulfurized spinel cathode steady in sulfide all-solid-state batteries. Nano Vitality 90, 106589 (2021).
Google Scholar
Nagao, M. et al. Response mechanism of all-solid-state lithium–sulfur battery with two-dimensional mesoporous carbon electrodes. J. Energy Sources 243, 60–64 (2013).
Google Scholar
Chinnam, P. R. et al. Unlocking failure mechanisms and enchancment of sensible Li–S pouch cells by way of in operando strain research. Adv. Vitality Mater. 12, 2103048 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bi, X. et al. Understanding the function of lithium iodide in lithium−oxygen batteries. Adv. Mater. 34, 2106148 (2022).
Google Scholar
Liu, S. et al. Tremendous long-cycling all-solid-state battery with skinny Li6PS5Cl-based electrolyte. Adv. Vitality Mater. 12, 2200660 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kato, Y. et al. Excessive-power all-solid-state batteries utilizing sulfide superionic conductors. Nat. Vitality 1, 16030 (2016).
Google Scholar
Seino, Y., Ota, T., Takada, Ok., Hayashi, A. & Tatsumisago, M. A sulphide lithium tremendous ion conductor is superior to liquid ion conductors to be used in rechargeable batteries. Vitality Environ. Sci. 7, 627–631 (2014).
Google Scholar
Zhou, L., Assoud, A., Zhang, Q., Wu, X. & Nazar, L. F. New household of argyrodite thioantimonate lithium superionic conductors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 19002–19013 (2019).
Google Scholar
Wang, S. et al. Lithium argyrodite as strong electrolyte and cathode precursor for strong‐state batteries with lengthy cycle life. Adv. Vitality Mater. 11, 2101370 (2021).
Google Scholar
Doux, J. M. et al. Strain results on sulfide electrolytes for all solid-state batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 8, 5049–5055 (2020).
Google Scholar
Su, Y. et al. A extra steady lithium anode by mechanical constriction for strong state batteries. Vitality Environ. Sci. 13, 908–916 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ye, L. et al. Towards greater voltage strong–state batteries by metastability and kinetic stability design. Adv. Vitality Mater. 10, 2001569 (2020). This paper offers an perception on how mechanical constrictions can result in mechanically induced metastability and the way mechanical constrictions can management decomposition kinetics to achieve unparalleled voltages and extra steady interfaces.
Google Scholar
Chen, Y. et al. Li metallic deposition and stripping in a solid-state battery through Coble creep. Nature 578, 251–255 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wang, H. et al. Linking the defects to the formation and progress of Li dendrite in all-solid-state batteries. Adv. Vitality Mater. 11, 2102148 (2021).
Google Scholar
Liang, J. et al. Website-occupation-tuned superionic LixScCl3+x halide strong electrolytes for all-solid-state batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 7012–7022 (2020).
Google Scholar
Dixit, M. et al. The function of isostatic urgent in large-scale manufacturing of solid-state batteries. ACS Vitality Lett. 7, 3936–3946 (2022).
Google Scholar
Tian, H. Ok. & Qi, Y. Simulation of the impact of contact space Loss in all-solid-state Li-ion batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, E3512–E3521 (2017). This research computes the contact space variation for all-solid-state Li-ion batteries throughout biking and offers the optimum strain worth to recuperate the capability drop attributable to contact space loss.
Google Scholar
Persson, B. N. J. Contact mechanics for randomly tough surfaces. Surf. Sci. Rep. 61, 201–227 (2006).
Google Scholar
Sakuda, A., Hayashi, A. & Tatsumisago, M. Sulfide strong electrolyte with favorable mechanical property for all-solid-state lithium battery. Sci. Rep. 3, 2261 (2013).
Google Scholar
Matsuda, S. & Nakamura, Ok. Impact of confining strain on the Li/Li7La3Zr2O12 interface throughout Li dissolution/deposition cycles. ACS Appl. Vitality Mater. 3, 11113–11118 (2020).
Google Scholar
Famprikis, T., Canepa, P., Dawson, J. A., Islam, M. S. & Masquelier, C. Fundamentals of inorganic solid-state electrolytes for batteries. Nat. Mater. 18, 1278–1291 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zhang, W. et al. Electrochemical enlargement throughout biking: monitoring the strain adjustments in working solid-state lithium batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 9929–9936 (2017).
Google Scholar
Hao, F., Han, F., Liang, Y., Wang, C. & Yao, Y. Architectural design and fabrication approaches for solid-state batteries. MRS Bull. 43, 775–781 (2018).
Google Scholar
Janek, J. & Zeier, W. G. A strong future for battery improvement. Nat. Vitality 1, 16141 (2016).
Google Scholar
Liu, X. et al. Electrochemo-mechanical results on structural integrity of Ni-rich cathodes with completely different microstructures in all solid-state batteries. Adv. Vitality Mater. 11, 2003583 (2021).
Google Scholar
Yan, H. et al. How does the creep stress regulate void formation on the lithium–strong electrolyte interface throughout stripping? Adv. Vitality Mater. 12, 2102283 (2022). This paper develops a normal electro-chemomechanical mannequin to disclose the mechanisms of void formation throughout Li stripping and explores the aggressive influences between stack strain and present density on void formation.
Google Scholar
Zhang, R. et al. Compositionally complicated doping for zero-strain zero-cobalt layered cathodes. Nature 610, 67–73 (2022).
Google Scholar
Cronau, M., Szabo, M., König, C., Wassermann, T. B. & Roling, B. The right way to measure a dependable ionic conductivity? The stack strain dilemma of microcrystalline sulfide-based strong electrolytes. ACS Vitality Lett. 6, 3072–3077 (2021). This research experiences the variations amongst several types of SSE supplies (amorphous electrolytes, glass ceramic electrolytes and microcrystalline electrolytes) with regard to the influences of each fabrication strain and stack strain on the ionic conductivity.
Google Scholar
Il’ina, E. A., Andreev, O. L., Antonov, B. D. & Batalov, N. N. Morphology and transport properties of the strong electrolyte Li7La3Zr2O12 ready by the solid-state and citrate–nitrate strategies. J. Energy Sources 201, 169–173 (2012).
Google Scholar
Raj, V. et al. Direct correlation between void formation and lithium dendrite progress in solid-state electrolytes with interlayers. Nat. Mater. 21, 1050–1056 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kang, H. et al. Geometric and electrochemical traits of LiNi1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2 electrode with completely different calendering situations. Electrochim. Acta 232, 431–438 (2017).
Google Scholar
Ebner, M., Geldmacher, F., Marone, F., Stampanoni, M. & Wooden, V. X-ray tomography of porous, transition metallic oxide primarily based lithium ion battery electrodes. Adv. Vitality Mater. 3, 845–850 (2013).
Google Scholar
Gao, X. et al. Stable-state lithium battery cathodes working at low pressures. Joule 6, 636–646 (2022).
Google Scholar
Li, W. J., Hirayama, M., Suzuki, Ok. & Kanno, R. Fabrication and all solid-state battery efficiency of TiS2/Li10GeP2S12 composite electrodes. Mater. Trans. 57, 549–552 (2016).
Google Scholar
Bae Music, Y. et al. Electrochemo-mechanical results as a important design issue for all-solid-state batteries. Curr. Opin. Stable. State Mater. Sci. 26, 100977 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kuppan, S., Xu, Y., Liu, Y. & Chen, G. Part transformation mechanism in lithium manganese nickel oxide revealed by single-crystal exhausting X-ray microscopy. Nat. Commun. 8, 14309 (2017).
Google Scholar
Yamamoto, M., Terauchi, Y., Sakuda, A., Kato, A. & Takahashi, M. Results of quantity variations beneath completely different compressive pressures on the efficiency and microstructure of all-solid-state batteries. J. Energy Sources 473, 228595 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lajtai, E. Z. A theoretical and experimental analysis of the Griffith idea of brittle fracture. Tectonophysics 11, 129–156 (1971).
Google Scholar
Taghikhani, Ok., Weddle, P. J., Hoffman, R. M., Berger, J. R. & Kee, R. J. Electro-chemo-mechanical finite-element mannequin of single-crystal and polycrystalline NMC cathode particles embedded in an argyrodite strong electrolyte. Electrochim. Acta 460, 142585 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kalnaus, S., Dudney, N. J., Westover, A. S., Herbert, E. & Hackney, S. Stable-state batteries: the important function of mechanics. Science 381, 1300 (2023). This evaluate focuses on the stress and pressure that originates from regular and prolonged biking of SSLBs and the related mechanisms for stress reduction.
Google Scholar
Wolfenstine, J. et al. A preliminary investigation of fracture toughness of Li7La3Zr2O12 and its comparability to different strong Li-ion conductors. Mater. Lett. 96, 117–120 (2013).
Google Scholar
Masias, A., Felten, N., Garcia-Mendez, R., Wolfenstine, J. & Sakamoto, J. Elastic, plastic, and creep mechanical properties of lithium metallic. J. Mater. Sci. 54, 2585–2600 (2018).
Google Scholar
Robertson, W. M. & Montgomery, D. J. Elastic modulus of isotopically-concentrated lithium. Phys. Rev. 117, 440–442 (1960).
Google Scholar
Zhang, L. et al. Lithium whisker progress and stress technology in an in situ atomic power microscope–environmental transmission electron microscope set-up. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 94–98 (2020).
Google Scholar
Xu, C., Ahmad, Z., Aryanfar, A., Viswanathan, V. & Greer, J. R. Enhanced power and temperature dependence of mechanical properties of Li at small scales and its implications for Li metallic anodes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 57–61 (2017).
Google Scholar
Wang, Y. & Cheng, Y. T. A nanoindentation research of the viscoplastic conduct of pure lithium. Scr. Mater. 130, 191–195 (2017).
Google Scholar
Herbert, E. G., Hackney, S. A., Thole, V., Dudney, N. J. & Phani, P. S. Nanoindentation of high-purity vapor deposited lithium movies: a mechanistic rationalization of the transition from diffusion to dislocation-mediated movement. J. Mater. Res. 33, 1361–1368 (2018).
Google Scholar
Herbert, E. G., Hackney, S. A., Dudney, N. J. & Phani, P. S. Nanoindentation of high-purity vapor deposited lithium movies: the elastic modulus. J. Mater. Res. 33, 1335–1346 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wang, Z. et al. Creep–enabled 3D strong–state lithium-metal battery. Chem 6, 2878–2892 (2020).
Google Scholar
Singh, D. Ok. et al. Overcoming anode instability in solid-state batteries by way of management of the lithium metallic microstructure. Adv. Funct. Mater. 33, 2211067 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kasemchainan, J. et al. Crucial stripping present results in dendrite formation on plating in lithium anode strong electrolyte cells. Nat. Mater. 18, 1105–1111 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lu, Y. et al. The void formation behaviors in working solid-state Li metallic batteries. Sci. Adv. 8, eadd0510 (2022).
Google Scholar
Doux, J. M. et al. Stack strain issues for room-temperature all-solid-state lithium metallic batteries. Adv. Vitality Mater. 10, 1903253 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ham, S. Y. et al. Assessing the important present density of all-solid-state Li metallic symmetric and full cells. Vitality Storage Mater. 55, 455–462 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wang, M. J., Choudhury, R. & Sakamoto, J. Characterizing the Li-solid-electrolyte interface dynamics as a operate of stack strain and present density. Joule 3, 2165–2178 (2019).
Google Scholar
Krauskopf, T., Hartmann, H., Zeier, W. G. & Janek, J. Towards a basic understanding of the lithium metallic anode in solid-state batteries — an electrochemo-mechanical research on the garnet-type strong electrolyte Li6.25Al0.25La3Zr2O12. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 14463–14477 (2019).
Google Scholar
McConohy, G. et al. Mechanical regulation of lithium intrusion likelihood in garnet strong electrolytes. Nat. Vitality 8, 241–250 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hu, X. et al. A lithium intrusion-blocking interfacial protect for wide-pressure-range solid-state lithium metallic batteries. Adv. Mater. 36, 2308275 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ghazi, Z. A. et al. Key points of lithium metallic anodes for lithium metallic batteries. Small 15, 1900687 (2019).
Google Scholar
Fincher, C. D. et al. Controlling dendrite propagation in solid-state batteries with engineered stress. Joule 6, 2794–2809 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ning, Z. et al. Dendrite initiation and propagation in lithium metallic solid-state batteries. Nature 618, 287–293 (2023). This paper reveals that initiation and propagation of Li dendrites in SSLBs are separate processes, and investigates the impact of pressurizing Li anodes throughout cost on crack propagation.
Google Scholar
Motoyama, M., Ejiri, M. & Iriyama, Y. Modeling the nucleation and progress of Li at metallic present collector/LiPON interfaces. J. Electrochem. Soc. 162, A7067–A7071 (2015).
Google Scholar
Wang, M. J., Carmona, E., Gupta, A., Albertus, P. & Sakamoto, J. Enabling ‘lithium-free’ manufacturing of pure lithium metallic solid-state batteries by way of in situ plating. Nat. Commun. 11, 5201 (2020).
Google Scholar
Koerver, R. et al. Chemo-mechanical enlargement of lithium electrode supplies — on the path to mechanically optimized all-solid-state batteries. Vitality Environ. Sci. 11, 2142–2158 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kazyak, E. et al. Understanding the electro-chemo-mechanics of Li plating in anode-free solid-state batteries with operando 3D microscopy. Matter 5, 3912–3934 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lai, G. et al. The mechanism of exterior strain suppressing dendrites progress in Li metallic batteries. J. Vitality Chem. 79, 489–494 (2023). This paper develops a machine studying potential mannequin to check the mechanism of dendrite progress suppression by exterior strain in Li metallic batteries.
Google Scholar
Fang, C. et al. Strain-tailored lithium deposition and dissolution in lithium metallic batteries. Nat. Vitality 6, 987–994 (2021).
Google Scholar
Monroe, C. & Newman, J. The impact of interfacial deformation on electrodeposition kinetics. J. Electrochem. Soc. 151, A880 (2004).
Google Scholar
Deshpande, V. S. & McMeeking, R. M. Fashions for the interaction of mechanics, electrochemistry, thermodynamics, and kinetics in lithium-ion batteries. Appl. Mech. Rev. 75, 010801 (2023). This evaluate focuses on the modelling of the interaction of mechanics, electrochemistry, thermodynamics and kinetics in SSLBs.
Google Scholar
Monroe, C. & Newman, J. The influence of elastic deformation on deposition kinetics at lithium/polymer interfaces. J. Electrochem. Soc. 152, A396–A404 (2004).
Google Scholar
Ahmad, Z. & Viswanathan, V. Stability of electrodeposition at strong–strong interfaces and implications for metallic anodes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 056003 (2017).
Google Scholar
Liang, Z. et al. Understanding the failure means of sulfide-based all-solid-state lithium batteries through operando nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Nat. Commun. 14, 259 (2023).
Google Scholar
Deng, W. et al. Quantification of reversible and irreversible lithium in sensible lithium-metal batteries. Nat. Vitality 7, 1031–1041 (2022).
Google Scholar
Fu, J. et al. In situ formation of a bifunctional interlayer enabled by a conversion response to initiatively forestall lithium dendrites in a garnet strong electrolyte. Vitality Environ. Sci. 12, 1404–1412 (2019).
Google Scholar
Krauskopf, T., Mogwitz, B., Rosenbach, C., Zeier, W. G. & Janek, J. Diffusion limitation of lithium metallic and Li–Mg alloy anodes on LLZO kind strong electrolytes as a operate of temperature and strain. Adv. Vitality Mater. 9, 1902568 (2019).
Google Scholar
Fu, X. et al. A high-performance carbonate-free lithium|garnet interface enabled by a hint quantity of sodium. Adv. Mater. 32, 2000575 (2020).
Google Scholar
Striebel, Ok. A., Sierra, A., Shim, J., Wang, C. W. & Sastry, A. M. The impact of compression on pure graphite anode efficiency and matrix conductivity. J. Energy Sources 134, 241–251 (2004).
Google Scholar
Arroyo y de Dompablo, M. E. et al. Polymorphs of Li3PO4 and Li2MSiO4 (M = Mn, Co). J. Energy Sources 189, 638–642 (2009).
Google Scholar
Yamaura, Ok. et al. Spinel-to-CaFe2O4-type structural transformation in LiMn2O4 beneath excessive strain. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 9448–9456 (2006).
Google Scholar
Yu, J. et al. Sensible development of multifunctional Li1.5Al0.5Ge1.5(PO4)3|Li intermediate interfaces for solid-state batteries. Vitality Storage Mater. 46, 68–75 (2022).
Google Scholar
Huang, Y. et al. Li-ion battery materials beneath excessive strain: amorphization and enhanced conductivity of Li4Ti5O12. Natl Sci. Rev. 6, 239–246 (2019).
Google Scholar
Amador, U. et al. Excessive strain polymorphs of LiCoPO4 and LiCoAsO4. Stable. State Sci. 11, 343–348 (2009).
Google Scholar
Tealdi, C., Heath, J. & Islam, M. S. Feeling the pressure: enhancing ionic transport in olivine phosphate cathodes for Li- and Na-ion batteries by way of pressure results. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 6998–7004 (2016).
Google Scholar
Wu, H., Wang, Z. & Fan, H. Stress–induced nanoparticle crystallization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 7634–7636 (2014).
Google Scholar
Kamali, Ok. & Ravindran, T. R. Temperature and strain dependent part transitions of beta’-LiZr2(PO4)3 studied by Raman spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. A 120, 1971–1977 (2016).
Google Scholar
Wu, L., Liu, Y., Zhang, D., Feng, L. & Qin, W. Improved electrochemical efficiency at excessive charges of LiNi0.6Co0.2Mn0.2O2 cathode supplies by strain–remedy. J. Stable. State Chem. 289, 121487 (2020).
Google Scholar
Xiao, P., Lv, T., Chen, X. & Chang, C. LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2: enhanced electrochemical efficiency from diminished cationic disordering in Li slab. Sci. Rep. 7, 1408 (2017).
Google Scholar
Uyama, T., Mukai, Ok. & Yamada, I. Synthesis of rhombohedral LiCo0.64Mn0.36O2 utilizing a high-pressure methodology. Inorg. Chem. 58, 6684–6695 (2019).
Google Scholar
Abulikemu, A. et al. Partial cation dysfunction in Li2MnO3 obtained by high-pressure synthesis. Appl. Phys. Lett. 120, 182404 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wang, S., Liu, J. & Solar, Q. New allotropes of Li2MnO3 as cathode supplies with higher biking efficiency predicted in excessive strain synthesis. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 16936–16943 (2017).
Google Scholar
Uyama, T., Mukai, Ok. & Yamada, I. Excessive-pressure synthesis and electrochemical properties of tetragonal LiMnO2. RSC Adv. 8, 26325–26334 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wang, S. et al. A high-pressure induced steady part of Li2MnSiO4 as an efficient poly-anion cathode materials from simulations. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 16406–16413 (2019).
Google Scholar
Grzechnik, A. et al. Reversible antifluorite to anticotunnite part transition in Li2S at excessive pressures. J. Stable. State Chem. 154, 603–611 (2000).
Google Scholar
García−Moreno, O. et al. Affect of the construction on the electrochemical efficiency of lithium transition metallic phosphates as cathodic supplies in rechargeable lithium batteries: a brand new high-pressure type of LiMPO4 (M = Fe and Ni). Chem. Mater. 13, 1570–1576 (2001).
Google Scholar
Zhang, M. et al. Excessive strain impact on structural and electrochemical properties of anionic redox-based lithium transition metallic oxides. Matter 4, 164–181 (2021).
Google Scholar
Schneider, C. et al. Impact of particle dimension and strain on the transport properties of the quick ion conductor t-Li7SiPS8. Adv. Vitality Mater. 13, 2203873 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yoshiyuki Inaguma, J. Y., Yue−Jin, S., Mitsuru, I. & Nakamura, T. The impact of the hydrostatic strain on the ionic conductivity in a perovskite lanthanum lithium titanate. J. Electrochem. Soc. 142, L8–L11 (1995).
Google Scholar
Hirose, E., Niwa, Ok., Kataoka, Ok., Akimoto, J. & Hasegawa, M. Structural stability of the Li-ion conductor Li7La3Zr2O12 investigated by high-pressure in-situ X–ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy. Mater. Res. Bull. 107, 361–365 (2018).
Google Scholar
Guillaume, C. L. et al. Chilly melting and strong constructions of dense lithium. Nat. Phys. 7, 211–214 (2011).
Google Scholar
Wang, X. et al. Glassy Li metallic anode for high-performance rechargeable Li batteries. Nat. Mater. 19, 1339–1345 (2020).
Google Scholar
Liu, Q. et al. Secure LAGP-based all solid-state Li metallic batteries with plastic super-conductive interlayer enabled by in-situ solidification. Vitality Storage Mater. 25, 613–620 (2020).
Google Scholar
Liu, Q. et al. Self-healing janus interfaces for prime–efficiency LAGP-based lithium metallic batteries. ACS Vitality Lett. 5, 1456–1464 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wu, F., Fitzhugh, W., Ye, L., Ning, J. & Li, X. Superior sulfide strong electrolyte by core–shell structural design. Nat. Commun. 9, 4037 (2018).
Google Scholar
Fitzhugh, W., Ye, L. & Li, X. The consequences of mechanical constriction on the operation of sulfide primarily based solid-state batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 23604–23627 (2019).
Google Scholar
Fitzhugh, W., Wu, F., Ye, L., Su, H. & Li, X. Pressure-stabilized ceramic–sulfide electrolytes. Small 15, 1901470 (2019).
Google Scholar
Soto, F. A., Marzouk, A., El-Mellouhi, F. & Balbuena, P. B. Understanding ionic diffusion by way of SEI elements for lithium-ion and sodium-ion batteries: insights from first-principles calculations. Chem. Mater. 30, 3315–3322 (2018).
Google Scholar
Peled, E. The electrochemical conduct of alkali and alkaline earth metals in nonaqueous battery techniques — the strong electrolyte interphase mannequin. J. Electrochem. Soc. 126, 2047–2051 (1979).
Google Scholar
Peled, E. & Menkin, S. Overview — SEI: previous, current and future. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, A1703–A1719 (2017).
Google Scholar
Adeli, P. et al. Boosting solid-state diffusivity and conductivity in lithium superionic argyrodites by halide substitution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 8681–8686 (2019).
Google Scholar
Jung, W. D. et al. Superionic halogen-rich Li-argyrodites utilizing in situ nanocrystal nucleation and fast crystal progress. Nano Lett. 20, 2303–2309 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kamaya, N. et al. A lithium superionic conductor. Nat. Mater. 10, 682–686 (2011).
Google Scholar
Ye, L. & Li, X. A dynamic stability design technique for lithium metallic strong state batteries. Nature 593, 218–222 (2021). This paper experiences a solid-state battery design of a less-stable electrolyte sandwiched between more-stable strong electrolytes that isn’t delicate to micrometre-sized cracks, to attain an ultrahigh present density with no Li dendrite penetration.
Google Scholar
Gil−González, E. et al. Synergistic results of chlorine substitution in sulfide electrolyte strong state batteries. Vitality Storage Mater. 45, 484–493 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ganser, M. et al. An prolonged formulation of Butler–Volmer electrochemical response kinetics together with the affect of mechanics. J. Electrochem. Soc. 166, H167–H176 (2019). This work discusses the quantitative results of exterior strain on chemical reactions in SSLBs described by the prolonged model of the Butler–Volmer equation.
Google Scholar
Giovanelli, D., Lawrence, N. S. & Compton, R. G. Electrochemistry at excessive pressures: a evaluate. Electroanalysis 16, 789–810 (2004).
Google Scholar
Web optimization, H. Ok. et al. Sturdy stress–composition coupling in lithium alloy nanoparticles. Nat. Commun. 10, 3428 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Z. et al. New horizons for inorganic strong state ion conductors. Vitality Environ. Sci. 11, 1945–1976 (2018).
Google Scholar
Muralidharan, N. et al. Tunable mechanochemistry of lithium battery electrodes. ACS Nano 11, 6243–6251 (2017).
Google Scholar
Christensen, J. & Newman, J. Stress technology and fracture in lithium insertion supplies. J. Stable. State Electrochem. 10, 293–319 (2006).
Google Scholar
Janek, J. & Zeier, W. G. Challenges in dashing up solid-state battery improvement. Nat. Vitality 8, 230–240 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wu, J. et al. Lowering the thickness of solid-state electrolyte membranes for high-energy lithium batteries. Vitality Environ. Sci. 14, 12–36 (2021).
Google Scholar
Cheng, D. et al. Unveiling the steady nature of the strong electrolyte interphase between lithium metallic and LiPON through cryogenic electron microscopy. Joule 4, 2484–2500 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Z. et al. Capturing the swelling of solid-electrolyte interphase in lithium metallic batteries. Science 375, 66–70 (2022).
Google Scholar
Liu, M. et al. Quantification of the Li-ion diffusion over an interface coating in all-solid-state batteries through NMR measurements. Nat. Commun. 12, 5943 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wang, H. et al. In operando neutron scattering multiple-scale research of lithium-ion batteries. Small 18, e2107491 (2022).
Google Scholar
Atkins, D. et al. Accelerating battery characterization utilizing neutron and synchrotron methods: towards a multi-modal and multi-scale standardized experimental workflow. Adv. Vitality Mater. 12, 2102694 (2021).
Google Scholar
Jung, S. H. et al. Ni-rich layered cathode supplies with electrochemo-mechanically compliant microstructures for all-solid-state Li batteries. Adv. Vitality Mater. 10, 1903360 (2019).
Google Scholar
Li, L. et al. Towards excessive efficiency all-solid-state lithium batteries with high-voltage cathode supplies: design methods for strong electrolytes, cathode interfaces, and composite electrodes. Adv. Vitality Mater. 11, 2003154 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wang, S. et al. Synthetic alloy/Li3N double-layer enabling steady high-capacity lithium metallic anodes. ACS Appl. Vitality Mater. 4, 13132–13139 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhao, X. et al. Design rules for zero-strain Li-ion cathodes. Joule 6, 1654–1671 (2022).
Google Scholar
Xu, C. et al. Constructed-in superionic conductive phases enabling dendrite-free, lengthy lifespan and excessive particular capability of composite lithium for steady solid-state lithium batteries. Vitality Environ. Sci. 16, 1049 (2023).
Google Scholar
Liu, Q. et al. Transference quantity reinforced-based gel copolymer electrolyte for dendrite-free lithium metallic batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 26612–26621 (2022).
Google Scholar
Gao, H. et al. Visualizing the failure of strong electrolyte beneath GPa-level interface stress induced by lithium eruption. Nat. Commun. 13, 5050 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bingkun Hu et al. An in situ-formed mosaic Li7Sn3@LiF interface layer for high-rate and long-life garnet-based lithium metallic batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 34939–34947 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kai, S. et al. In situ development of an ultra-stable conductive composite interface for high-voltage all-solid-state lithium metallic batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 11784–11788 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zheng, H. et al. A rational design of garnet-type Li7La3Zr2O12 with ultrahigh moisture stability. Vitality Storage Mater. 49, 278–290 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ren, Y. et al. Results of Li supply on microstructure and ionic conductivity of Al-contained Li6.75La3Zr1.75Ta0.25O12 ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 35, 561–572 (2015).
Google Scholar
Buschmann, H., Berendts, S., Mogwitz, B. & Janek, J. Lithium metallic electrode kinetics and ionic conductivity of the strong lithium ion conductors ‘Li7La3Zr2O12’ and Li7−xLa3Zr2−xTaxO12 with garnet-type construction. J. Energy Sources 206, 236–244 (2012).
Google Scholar
Solar, F. et al. Native Li+ framework regulation of a garnet-type solid-state electrolyte. ACS Vitality Lett. 7, 2835–2844 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yu, C. et al. Enabling ultrafast ionic conductivity in Br-based lithium argyrodite electrolytes for solid-state batteries with completely different anodes. Vitality Storage Mater. 30, 238–249 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhou, L. et al. A brand new halospinel superionic conductor for high-voltage all strong state lithium batteries. Vitality Environ. Sci. 13, 2056–2063 (2020).
Google Scholar
Park, Ok. H. et al. Excessive-voltage superionic halide strong electrolytes for all-solid-state Li-ion batteries. ACS Vitality Lett. 5, 533–539 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wang, C. et al. Interface-assisted in-situ progress of halide electrolytes eliminating interfacial challenges of all-inorganic solid-state batteries. Nano Vitality 76, 105015 (2020).
Google Scholar
Riegger, L. M., Schlem, R., Sann, J., Zeier, W. G. & Janek, J. Lithium-metal anode instability of the superionic halide strong electrolytes and the implications for solid-state batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 6718–6723 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lee, W. et al. Ceramic–salt composite electrolytes from chilly sintering. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1807872 (2019).
Google Scholar
Chen, L. et al. Glorious Li/garnet interface wettability achieved by porous exhausting carbon layer for strong state Li metallic battery. Small 18, e2106142 (2021).
Google Scholar
Duan, H. et al. Constructing an air steady and lithium deposition regulable garnet interface from moderate-temperature conversion chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 12069–12075 (2020).
Google Scholar
Li, S. Y., Wang, W. P., Xin, S., Zhang, J. & Guo, Y. G. A facile technique to reconcile 3D anodes and ceramic electrolytes for steady solid-state Li metallic batteries. Vitality Storage Mater. 32, 458–464 (2020).
Google Scholar
Solar, Z. et al. Transition metallic dichalcogenides in alliance with Ag ameliorate the interfacial connection between Li anode and garnet strong electrolyte. J. Energy Sources 468, 228379 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ji, X. et al. Stable-state electrolyte design for lithium dendrite suppression. Adv. Mater. 32, 2002741 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zeng, D. et al. Selling favorable interfacial properties in lithium-based batteries utilizing chlorine-rich sulfide inorganic solid-state electrolytes. Nat. Commun. 13, 1909 (2022).
Google Scholar
Jiang, Z. et al. Enhanced air stability and interfacial compatibility of Li-argyrodite sulfide electrolyte triggered by CuBr co-substitution for all-solid-state lithium batteries. Vitality Storage Mater. 56, 300–309 (2023).
Google Scholar
Chen, X. et al. Improved stability in opposition to moisture and lithium metallic by doping F into Li3InCl6. J. Energy Sources 545, 231939 (2022).
Google Scholar
Mo, H. et al. Lead-free solid-state natural–inorganic halide perovskite electrolyte for lithium-ion conduction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14, 17479–17485 (2022).
Google Scholar